Integrity-Driven Leadership: It's A Matter of Trust
Randy G. Pennington
"We don't trust them!" This phrase has become synonymous with
the majority view of our leaders. James Patterson and Peter Kim writing
in The Second American Revolution (Morrow, 1994) cited a dearth of
leaders and "an erosion of trust in the nation's governing institutions"
as the most profoundly expressed concern among the participants in their
study. The President of the United States finished thirty-fifth in a ranking
of 72 professions on the basis of honesty and integrity. Congressmen ranked
number 66, and local politicians finished sixty-seventh (narrowly edging
out street peddlers, prostitutes and TV evangelists). The perception that
senior managers don't trust employees; employees don't trust senior managers;
and middle managers don't trust anyone is rampant.
The message is simple a lack of trust is the number one leadership problem
facing our country today. The inability to address this issue prevents our
organizations, institutions and communities from successfully addressing
the challenges of the present and future.
Why Trust Has Diminished
Distrust of leaders has reached current levels thanks to a variety of
incidents that began with the Watergate scandal and continue to the present
allegations regarding the integrity of leaders from both political parties.
In addition we have been treated to enormous increases in executive compensation
in the midst of large lay-off's; celebrities and sports heroes seemingly
rewarded for illegal and unethical activities; and abuse of privilege stories
from a variety of both corporate and public institutions. Untrustworthy
leaders have always existed. However, the apparent rewarding of questionable
behavior while those of unquestioned integrity fail to win the prize has
created distrust in places and proportions not previously experienced. The
rise in cynicism is underscored by the following statistics:
- 74% of respondents to one survey said they would steal from someone
who would not miss it
- 76% of those honored as Who's Who In American High School Students
in 1996 admitted to cheating at some point in their academic studies
- 85% of respondents to a survey stated that honest, upright and ethical
management is very important while only 40% said that it was very true
in their organization
Leaders who fail to do what they say they will do, even in the most minor
areas, reinforce the belief that no one can be trusted.
Americans are historically suspicious of their leaders. The roots of
this cynicism are grounded in the principle that all men are created equal.
The factors that make democracy work also create the environment for healthy
skepticism. Additionally, the media has made questioning the decisions and
motives of our leaders a national past time. A slow news day can mean that
an otherwise minor issue becomes a front page event. Increased access to
information creates even more opportunities for people to examine the actions
and motives of their leaders.
A final factor contributing to diminished trust is increasing demands.
Each of us is being asked to do more and more with less and less. With the
realization that making ends meet is more difficult comes the fear that
others are somehow responsible for putting us in this situation. A rapidly
changing environment dictates that everyone must accept additional responsibility
for success, but the common response is to distrust the leader who advocates
change.
Integrity-driven leaders are different
Leaders who maintain the long-term trust of others share several common
characteristics. All effective leaders focus on results. Integrity-driven
leaders expand that focus to include relationships. They understand that
earning the trust of others requires more than a single-minded devotion
to the bottom line. Integrity-driven leaders value the credibility earned
through character, competence and a genuine desire to serve others. Their
commitment to achieving results without sacrificing relationships generates
confidence and reinforces a power base that is built on trust rather than
fear or utility.
Five C's for maintaining trust
Earning and maintaining the trust of others requires leaders to excel
in the following five areas:
- Character: Any discussion of trust begins here. Character defines
an individual's approach for dealing with themselves and others. It is
the demonstration of the principles adopted for basic living. For leaders,
personal character can be the difference between achieving long-term commitment
or settling for mere compliance from others. Leaders who embody basic principles
such as honesty, trustworthiness, loyalty, justice, patience and duty find
that their new programs and initiatives are accepted as honest attempts
to move the organization forward. The nagging question of motive lingers
in situations where the leader's character is in question. Outstanding
interpersonal and organizational skills may suffice for a while; however,
time eventually wounds all heels.
- Competence: The popular comic strip "Dilbert" has
made the concept of "leader without a clue" an accepted fact
in today's organizations. Leaders concerned with maintaining long-term
trust actively accept their responsibility to be aware of changes and their
effect on the organization's ability to deliver on its promises. Integrity-driven
leaders realize that individuals must have the necessary knowledge and
ability prior to being held accountable for performance. They recognize
their individual strengths and weaknesses; surround themselves with the
best talent available; and commit to continuous growth in all areas of
the individual performance. Leaders who inspire the trust and confidence
of others strive to solve one hundred problems one time rather than solving
on problem one hundred times.
- Communication: Effective communication is an essential leadership
skill. Unfortunately, too much emphasis has been placed on the importance
of the spoken and written word. Many contributed President Ronald Reagan's
label as "The Great Communicator" to his performance in front
of the camera. Outstanding presentation skills certainly contributed to
his reputation, but Reagan's effectiveness was in large part due to his
ability to show the majority of Americans that he understood their situation.
We tend to trust those who appreciate our goals, struggles, joys and environment.
We respond to encouragement with renewed commitment. A bond is created
with the leader who recognizes our interdependence and shows an interest
in us as complete individuals.
- Consistency: Followers rely on consistency to determine their
course of action in given situations. Confidence that the leader's response
will be in line with past experience frees them to devote energy to the
problem at hand and not worry about protecting themselves from an unpredictable
response. Likewise, trust is diminished when the leader's behavior is confusing
or indecisive. Nowhere is this more evident than the tendency to abandon
a strategic initiative at the firs sign of trouble. It is easy to support
the latest organizational program or values statement when everything is
working well. The true test of a leader's consistency is the performance
under less than perfect conditions.
- Courage: Earning and maintaining the trust of a variety of stakeholders
in an increasingly competitive and demanding world requires courage. Integrity-driven
leaders know that delivering on their promises takes the courage to demand
the very best from themselves and their organizations. Their vision is
aggressive and the challenges of change are confronted head-on. True courage
requires commitment and the willingness to accept personal risk. It fosters
admiration and sets in motion a series of events that influence success.
Three Action Steps
Integrity-driven leadership is the art of influencing the actions and
outcomes of others in a way that builds trust and achieves results. It is
a continuous journey to improve in the areas of character, competence, communication,
consistency and courage. The following three action steps will help you
move along the path:
- Focus on who and what you are. List the principles that you would like
others to use when describing your character. Spend time in regular self-evaluation
to determine areas that need improvement. Learn something every day that
will increase your competence. Arie de Geus, retired manager of planning
for Royal Dutch/Shell said, "The ability to learn faster than competitors
may be the only sustainable competitive advantage."
- Communicate first to understand then to be understood. Listen to team
members and stakeholders. See the world through their eyes. Find out what
motivates them. Walk or work in their shoes for a day, and see what really
bugs them. Receptivity to the message and motive increases when understanding
exists.
- Help others succeed. Nothing increases trust like creating interdependent
partnerships where everyone wins. Increase consistency by creating alignment
between strategies, structures and systems. Provide the necessary knowledge
and skills. Use honest mistakes as an opportunity to learn, and expect
success.
Max DePree, former CEO of Herman Miller Corporation, says in his book
Leadership Is An Art, "The signs of outstanding leadership appear
primarily among the followers." Significant progress toward that goal
can be measured by the absence of the words "We don't trust them."
1997 Pennington Performance Group; Dallas, TX. All rights reserved.
This article may be downloaded for personal and professional development.
Copies may be shared within an individual organization. All other uses of
this material are strictly prohibited without written permission from the
author.
|